What are the implications and importance of Jordan providing legal reviews in South Africa’s lawsuit against Israel?

أخبار السعودية11 يناير 2024آخر تحديث :
What are the implications and importance of Jordan providing legal reviews in South Africa’s lawsuit against Israel?

اخبار السعودية – وطن نيوز

عاجل اخبار السعودية – اخبار اليوم السعودية

W6nnews.com  ==== وطن === تاريخ النشر – 2024-01-11 22:31:44

https://sputnikarabic.ae/20240111/What-the-connotations-and-importance-of-Jordan-providing-legal-reviews-in-the-south-Africa-against-Israel-case-1084899377.html

What are the implications and importance of Jordan providing legal reviews in South Africa’s lawsuit against Israel?

What are the implications and importance of Jordan providing legal reviews in South Africa’s lawsuit against Israel?

In a move of solidarity with South Africa’s movements, Jordan announced that it would submit the necessary legal reviews and pleadings as soon as the International Court of Justice decides to consider South Africa’s lawsuit against… 11.01.2024, Sputnik Arabic

2024-01-11T19:31+0000

2024-01-11T19:31+0000

2024-01-11T19:31+0000

Exclusive

Sputnik reports

Jordan News

South Africa

Israel

/html/head/meta[@name=”og:title”]/@content

/html/head/meta[@name=”og:description”]/@content

https://cdn1.img.sputnikarabic.ae/img/102024/80/1020248034_0:0:2048:1152_1920x0_80_0_0_3b4abb9a38d54d4b639279bf2fb63ed5.jpg

Observers said that the Jordanian move comes as a continuation of the political and diplomatic efforts it has been making since the beginning of the Israeli aggression, in order to stop the massacres, bring humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip, and prevent the displacement of Palestinians. Some raised questions about the implications of the Jordanian move, and what it could add to the progress of the lawsuit filed by South Africa. Against Israel committing genocide in Gaza. Jordanian support. Hamada Abu Najma, the Jordanian international legal expert, said that the Jordanian political position was clear from the beginning of the events in Gaza, with its demand to stop the aggression and reject Israel’s goals, especially with regard to fears of the intention to empty the Gaza Strip of its population and displace them, In an attempt to exploit the events of October 7 to achieve the expansion policies that it has been planning for a long time, which is of the greatest interest to the Jordanian state. According to his talk to “Sputnik”, Jordan rejected attempts to displace the Palestinians, and demanded preventing forced displacement, and rejected the policy of collective punishment against them, He considered that what the occupation is doing by denying food, water and medicine to the people of Gaza constitutes war crimes, and described the practices targeting civilians as brutal crimes against the Palestinians. He continued: “What resulted was that Jordan announced during the crisis that it would stop signing the energy-for-water agreement; Which was supposed to be signed last October, and that the “Wadi Araba” treaty between the two countries would be considered merely a piece of paper that would be covered with dust, and that Israel was committing war crimes, and that any attempt to displace the Palestinians would be tantamount to a declaration of war on Jordan.” He explained that all of these positions formed a solid foundation. The Jordanian position in support of the lawsuit filed by South Africa against Israel, a lawsuit that is consistent in its content and merits with Jordan’s clear and decisive directions in this regard, not to mention that Jordan is closest to the suffering of the Palestinian people and most affected by the complexities of the conflict in the region, and is also consistent with its efforts to deter the occupation and stop its crimes. In a situation in which a member state of the United Nations defies international law and the will of the international community and acts as if it is above international law. He believes that Jordan is expected to participate in providing the necessary legal investigations and pleadings as soon as the court issues its decision on the genocide claim, and not before that, as countries are expected to wait. Supporting the completion of the first stage of South Africa’s request, as submitting a series of “pledging” at this stage may lead to postponing the decision in the original case, and it is better to wait and not submit supporting pleadings now and wait for the next stage of any decision taken by the International Court. A firm position on its part, Dr. Sabah Al-Shaar, a former member of the Jordanian House of Representatives, considered that Jordan’s support for the lawsuit submitted by South Africa to the Criminal Court against Israel comes in the context of Jordan’s firm position towards Palestine, and its endeavor to limit the genocide it is committing against the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip. According to her speech, According to Sputnik, “The visit of Jordanian King Abdullah II to Rwanda and his speech on the wall of the Kigali Genocide Memorial came as a message to the world that Israel is practicing genocide against the Palestinian people, which came days before the first session presented by South Africa in The Hague.” She explained that This confirms that Jordan has begun to transform with the need for international organizations and institutions to take a strict stance towards Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people. It is noteworthy that with the continuation of Israeli violations against civilians in the Gaza Strip, and with the failure of all diplomatic attempts to stop them, South Africa resorted to filing a lawsuit before the Court of Justice. The International Court in The Hague. The lawsuit says that “Israel’s actions amounted to genocide in nature, and therefore the state violated its obligations under the Genocide Convention.” Israel decided to appear before the International Court of Justice to address South Africa’s lawsuit, which it described as not based on any legal basis. Pretoria is accused of cooperating with what it called “a terrorist group calling for the destruction of Israel.” It is noteworthy that Israel is a signatory to the Convention against Genocide, according to which the Court of Justice derives its authority to consider the complaint filed against it from South Africa, and according to the court’s ruling, any country may It signed the treaty for another country to complain to the court even if it was not harmed by it itself. In its request to the court, South Africa said that “Israel is committing genocide in the Gaza Strip, and it does not work to punish those who incite genocide.” South Africa requested Africa asked the court to discuss the issue, in the coming days, and issue a temporary order against Israel calling for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. According to the request, this step is necessary to protect the Palestinians from “additional and irreparable harm.” It also asked the court to order Israel to allow For Palestinians who were displaced from their homes in the Gaza Strip to return to them, stop depriving them of food, water and humanitarian aid, ensure that Israelis do not incite genocide and punish those who do, and allow an independent investigation into Israel’s military operations.

https://sputnikarabic.ae/20240110/The-Jordanian-Prime-Government-announces-a-movement-regarding-the-lawsuit-against-Israel-before-the-international-justice-1084860238.html

https://sputnikarabic.ae/20240111/Why-south-africa-took-up-the-mission-of-prosecuting-israel-and-what-this-step-represents-1084898307.html

https://sputnikarabic.ae/20240111/The-Israeli-Foreign-State-Accuses-South-Africa-of-being-the-judicial-arm-of-Hamas–1084884722.html

https://sputnikarabic.ae/20240108/The-Jordanian-Monarch-Israel’s-brutal-war-on-the-Palestinians-created-an-entire-generation-of-orphans-1084801377.html

South Africa

Israel

2024

Sputnik Arabic

feedback.arabic@sputniknews.com

+74956456601

MIA “Rosiya Segodnya”

News

en_EG

Sputnik Arabic

feedback.arabic@sputniknews.com

+74956456601

MIA “Rosiya Segodnya”

https://cdn1.img.sputnikarabic.ae/img/102024/80/1020248034_256:0:1792:1152_1920x0_80_0_0_b0603b283a0a343fb77748b66a68cbe5.jpg

Exclusive, Sputnik reports, Jordan news, South Africa, Israel

Exclusive, Sputnik reports, Jordan news, South Africa, Israel

Exclusive

In a move of solidarity with South Africa’s movements, Jordan announced that it would submit the necessary legal reviews and pleadings as soon as the International Court of Justice decides to consider South Africa’s lawsuit against the genocide in Gaza.

Observers said that the Jordanian move comes as a continuation of the political and diplomatic efforts it has been making since the beginning of the Israeli aggression, in order to stop the massacres, bring humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip, and prevent the displacement of Palestinians.

Some raised questions about the implications of the Jordanian move, and what it could add to the progress of the lawsuit filed by South Africa against Israel’s commission of genocide in Gaza.

Jordanian support

Hamada Abu Najma, a Jordanian international legal expert, said that the Jordanian political position was clear from the beginning of the events in Gaza, with its demand to stop the aggression and reject Israel’s goals, especially with regard to fears of the intention to empty the Gaza Strip of its residents and displace them, in an attempt to exploit the events of October 7 to achieve policies. The expansion that it has been planning for a long time, and which is of the greatest interest to the Jordanian state.

The Jordanian Prime Minister announces action regarding the lawsuit against Israel before the International Justice Department.
According to his talk to “Sputnik”, Jordan rejected attempts to displace the Palestinians, demanded the prevention of forced displacement, rejected the policy of collective punishment against them, and considered that what the occupation is doing by denying food, water and medicine to the people of Gaza constitutes war crimes, and described the practices that are being carried out targeting civilians as Brutal crimes against Palestinians.

He continued: “What resulted was that Jordan announced during the crisis that it would stop signing the energy-for-water agreement, which was supposed to be signed last October, and that it would consider the “Wadi Araba” treaty between the two countries to be just paper that would be covered with dust, and that Israel was committing war crimes, and that Any attempt to displace Palestinians will be tantamount to a declaration of war on Jordan.”

He explained that all of these positions formed a solid basis for the Jordanian position in support of the lawsuit filed by South Africa against Israel, a lawsuit that is consistent in its content and merits with Jordan’s clear and decisive directions in this regard, not to mention that Jordan is closest to the suffering of the Palestinian people and most affected by the complexities of the conflict in the region. It is also consistent with his efforts to deter the occupation and stop its crimes, in a situation in which a member state of the United Nations defies international law and the will of the international community and acts as if it is above international law.

Flag of South Africa - Sputnik Arabic, 1920, 11.01.2024

Why is South Africa taking on the task of suing Israel and what does this constitute?
He believes that Jordan is expected to participate in providing the necessary legal investigations and pleadings as soon as the court issues its decision on the genocide claim, and not before that, as the supporting countries are expected to wait for the completion of the first stage of South Africa’s request, as submitting a series of “pledging” at this stage may It leads to postponing the decision in the original case, and it is better to wait and not submit supporting arguments now and wait for the next stage of any decision taken by the international court.

For her part, Dr. Sabah Al-Shaar, a former member of the Jordanian House of Representatives, considered that Jordan’s support for the lawsuit submitted by South Africa to the Criminal Court against Israel comes in the context of Jordan’s firm position towards Palestine, and its endeavor to limit the genocide it is committing against the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip. .

According to her statement to Sputnik, “The visit of Jordanian King Abdullah II to Rwanda and his speech on the wall of the Kigali Genocide Memorial came as a message to the world that Israel is practicing genocide against the Palestinian people, which came days before the first session presented by South Africa in The Hague.”
Flag of Israel - Sputnik Arabic, 1920, 11.01.2024

The Israeli Foreign Ministry accuses South Africa of being a “judicial arm of Hamas”

She explained that this confirms that Jordan has begun to transform with the need for international organizations and institutions to take a strict stance towards Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people.

It is noteworthy that with the continued Israeli violations against civilians in the Gaza Strip, and with the failure of all diplomatic attempts to stop them, South Africa resorted to filing a lawsuit before the International Court of Justice in The Hague.

“Israel’s actions amounted to genocide in nature, and the state therefore violated its obligations under the Genocide Convention,” the suit says.

Israel decided to appear before the International Court of Justice to address South Africa’s lawsuit, which it described as not based on any legal basis, accusing Pretoria of cooperating with what it called “a terrorist group calling for the destruction of Israel.”

King of Jordan, Abdullah II, during a press conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Berlin, Germany, October 17, 2023 - Sputnik Arabic, 1920, 01.08.2024

Jordanian King: Israel’s brutal war on the Palestinians created “an entire generation of orphans”

It is noteworthy that Israel is a signatory to the Convention against Genocide, according to which the Court of Justice derives its authority to consider the complaint filed against it by South Africa. According to the court’s ruling, any country that has signed the treaty may file a complaint against another country to the court even if it is not harmed by it. Are the same.

In its request to the court, South Africa said that “Israel is committing genocide in the Gaza Strip, and it does not work to punish those who incite genocide.”

South Africa asked the court to discuss the issue, in the coming days, and issue a temporary order against Israel calling for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. According to the request, this step is necessary to protect the Palestinians from “additional and irreparable harm.”

It also asked the court to order Israel to allow Palestinians who were displaced from their homes in the Gaza Strip to return to it, to stop depriving them of food, water and humanitarian aid, to ensure that Israelis do not incite genocide and punish those who do, and to allow an independent investigation into Israel’s military operations. .


تويتر اخبار السعودية

What are the implications and importance of Jordan providing legal reviews in South Africa’s lawsuit against Israel?

اخر اخبار السعودية

اخبار السعودية 24

اخبار السعوديه

#implications #importance #Jordan #providing #legal #reviews #South #Africas #lawsuit #Israel

المصدر – وطن نيوز عربي – أخبار الدول العربية والعالم | آخر الأخبار