اخبار اليمن – وطن نيوز
اخبار اليمن اليمن الان – اخبار اليمن اليوم
W6nnews.com ==== وطن === تاريخ النشر – 2026-06-29 04:20:00
June 29, 2026 Visits: 113 Abbas Al-Qaedi/ Many researchers recount a will attributed to King Abdulaziz Al Saud to his eldest sons before his death, telling them: “Every evil or good emanates from Yemen.” This is why the Kingdom has been interfering in Yemeni affairs for decades, and has been able to impose its hegemony on the political scene for many decades. There are many methods and forms of Saudi intervention in Yemen, ranging from direct military intervention, or interventions through indirect methods to influence the political scene. The Kingdom engaged in direct conflicts with Yemen due to border disputes, as happened in the war that broke out in 1934 AD, and also based on its support for the regime of President Ali Abdullah Saleh in the aggression against Saada in 2009 AD. The Saudi Academy, Dr. Madawi Al-Rasheed, confirms that Saudi policy towards Yemen since 1930 AD has been based on manipulating the tribal and religious structure, and systematic work to weaken the country and booby-trapping it from within, explaining that Saudi Arabia relies on the weapon of money and the purchase of debts to attract officials, leaders, and sheikhs, and transfer their loyalty from their homeland to the Saudi regime, and this Saudi historical strategy aims to keep Yemen in a permanent state of weakness and fragmentation, ensuring easy control over it. And subjecting him to absolute guardianship and subordination to Riyadh indefinitely. This proposal is reinforced by the many statements of mercenary officials who have been embraced by Saudi Arabia for more than ten years, as the mercenary Sultan Al-Barakani describes Yemen as… [حديقة خلفية]This reveals the nature of the functional role and the low moral level of these tools. Without this absolute dependence, Saudi Arabia would not have been able to implement its destructive plans against the Yemeni people. The mercenary Abdul Aziz Jabbari reveals what is hidden and exposes the extent of the dependency and blind dependency that the mercenary government is experiencing, which has reached the point of selling the country’s capabilities, land, and sovereign wealth. Jabbari explicitly admits that all looted national revenues and wealth are supplied directly to the accounts of the Saudi program, where they are disposed of according to the desire and sovereign dictates of Saudi Arabia. This recognition reaffirms that these tools have no control over them, and do not have any margin for decision, whether small or large, which accurately represents the servile and subservient model that Saudi Arabia seeks to impose and generalize on Yemen as a whole. In a decline that reveals the depth of dependence, the Minister of Defense of the mercenaries, Major General Taher Ali Aida Al-Aqili, reduces Yemen and its historical weight to a mere annex of the so-called Saudi National Security. Al-Aqili believes that no country in the world has the right to deal with Yemen, nor do the Yemenis themselves have the right to manage their own affairs or build international relations, except through Riyadh’s portal and with its absolute approval. When the broadcaster asked him about the justification that gives Riyadh the right to this guardianship, he invoked what he called international legitimacy and the laws of the world, claiming that Yemen is subject to the guardianship of the so-called Quartet in accordance with Security Council resolutions, and that these countries have officially authorized Saudi Arabia to be a guardian of Yemen and its people! Saudi Arabia classifies Yemen’s independence and its ownership of its sovereign decision-making as a red line and political prohibition. This hostility is not linked to a specific regime, party, tribe, or sect. Rather, any Yemeni component that adheres to freedom, dignity, and true sovereignty is considered, in the Saudi perspective, an adversary that must be fought, to ensure that Yemen remains in the cycle of dependency and sustainable weakness. The best proof of this is the crime of assassinating the late President Ibrahim al-Hamdi, as his liberation project was targeted to build a strong, modernizing state that would graduate. in Yemen under the mantle of foreign guardianship, an approach that was rejected and liquidated through a conspiracy carried out under the direct supervision of the Saudi military attaché in Sanaa at the time. Returning to that historical era, the fundamental question arises: Why did Saudi Arabia assassinate President Ibrahim Al-Hamdi? The answer lies in the fact that his handling of internal issues, starting with reorganizing the army and formulating its national doctrine, all the way to building modern state institutions and consolidating their foundations, aroused the ire of his opponents at home and abroad. The Saudi position towards him turned into direct hostility after his categorical refusal to demarcate the borders according to external conditions, and his strategic interest in the Red Sea security file, in addition to his accelerated steps towards achieving Yemeni unity. The Saudi role in Yemen was always based on keeping the country under hegemony, and Al-Hamdi was not accepted by Riyadh, which saw in him, especially in the late days of his reign, an independent national leader threatening its influence and interests, and his tireless efforts increased Saudi concern. To bring views closer and rapprochement with South Yemen; Riyadh was very afraid of any effort that would lead to unifying the two parts and establishing a strong and unified Yemeni state. It is clearly evident, through the assassination of Al-Hamdi, that the war and the current Saudi targeting of Yemen, which comes under the pretext of confronting ‘Ansar Allah’, is nothing but a cover and deception. Saudi hostility has been going on since the establishment of the Saudi entity, which was founded on a political doctrine that sees a strong, stable, and unified Yemen as an imminent and direct threat to its existence. The Saudi regime does not accept it unless the Yemeni is hired or has no will and can be bought with political money. As for the Yemeni people and their free people, they have fully realized the secret of their suffering, and they have become well aware of the extent of the threat and existential targeting that the Saudi regime poses to all the details and human life in Yemen. This scandalous statement by one of the most prominent Saudi agents in Al-Jawf, called Al-Hassan Abkar, reveals the nature of the job role of mercenaries. He boastfully acknowledges that he received five hundred military vehicles (kits) at the beginning of the aggression, distributed by the Saudi regime and what he calls philanthropists, at intervals. Here the true face of Saudi policy is revealed: a generous donation and spending of two billion without a ceiling or account, as long as the goal is to booby-trap Yemen, tear apart its social fabric, and drown it in strife in order to return it as a child to the house of obedience. If Saudi Arabia had spent this money in the service of the Yemeni people, it would have lifted millions out of poverty and hunger. Today, the people of Aden and Mukalla are suffering and dying from the intense heat, while Saudi Arabia, which wastes hundreds of vehicles in an instant for one mercenary, is unable to illuminate these cities through a clearly defined policy of collective punishment. The facts prove that what the mercenaries fear most is exposure and exposure in front of the Yemeni people, and this always comes to confirm the facts and reveal the hidden, and perhaps the comparison between the two situations summarizes the entire story in the first scene, this mercenary appears earlier as if he is the king of the world; Saudi Arabia showers him with money and military equipment to wreak havoc in his homeland and spark civil war between the people of his province and his tribe. The second scene documents the stage of collapse after Saudi Arabia dispensed with his services. As soon as his papers burned and he failed to ignite internal strife, they threw him, and many like him, in the trash, followed by screaming and belated wailing, and this is the natural end for anyone who sells his homeland. In the end, they find themselves without value or dignity. They do not gain the respect of their tribes and countrymen at home, nor do they maintain their status with the foreign occupier who once bought them with defiled money. The mercenary was earlier, thinking delusively that the acquisition of hundreds of military vehicles and Saudi funds was the ultimate in power and empowerment, but he realized late, and too late, the eternal truth, that if a person possesses all the money of the earth and his dignity and freedom are taken away from him, he will be worth nothing and nothing will remain of any value to him, and today, while this mercenary dragged the tails of disappointment into the hollow, the Saudi regime does not stop trying to recycle and produce new tools and mercenaries; Perhaps the last of these examples is the one who used the pretext of “Saddam Hussein’s daughter” and lamenting over her as a scandalous cover, to begin the journey of dependence from the same shameful point at which his predecessors ended, just as we witnessed in the end for his fellow mercenary Hassan Abkar. In this new attempt to ignite strife in Al-Jawf Governorate, the Saudi planner wore a different disguise with the aim of camouflaging and misleading. A play was fabricated claiming that someone claiming to be the daughter of Saddam Hussein took refuge with the tribes and cut her hair asking for supplies, betting on stirring the chivalry and jealousy of the tribes of Al-Jawf behind this cheap tool. However, the real goal behind this farce is to spark conflict and strife among the people of the governorate first, and then spread it to the rest of the governorates if it succeeds. This failed tactic seeks to show the event as a purely tribal issue with no connection to the Saudi regime, under the banner of help and tribal jealousy. After the forces of aggression went bankrupt and found nothing to trade with and to draw emotions from except Saddam Hussein’s family, and in contrast to this charlatanism and blatant falsification, through the speech of Saddam Hussein’s real and actual daughter, the difference becomes clear and the truth is revealed. This is the truth in the words of Raghad, the actual daughter of Saddam Hussein, who conveyed a crucial commandment from her father in which he warned them against future rumors, assuring her and her siblings: ‘If someone one day claims that I have children other than you, do not believe him, for I only have the five of you.’ Raghad explained that her father’s keenness as head of state to consolidate this information was due to his prior awareness and foresight that international intelligence services would not hesitate to fabricate lies, or fabricate and fabricate fictitious lineages and relatives for him with the aim of using them in subsequent political conspiracies. Today, this exposes the scandalous pretext that Riyadh’s tools tried to use in Al-Jawf. This is how the threads of this farce fell, confirming that the cheap political investment in it and turning it into a material for incitement was in no way a spontaneous act, and the overwhelming evidence is that as soon as the conspiracy was exposed and the truth about the alleged daughter was exposed, the directors of the strife moved directly to an alternative plan to blow up the situation among the people of Al-Jawf Governorate. They deliberately blocked roads and fled towards areas controlled by mercenaries to set up tribal enclaves and target citizens under the banner of revenge for Saddam Hussein’s daughter. It is an ironic paradox; These mercenaries who are crying today over an imaginary woman are the same ones who kidnapped the women of Al-Jawf, and the Saudi regime that finances them is the one who killed thousands of Yemeni women and souls. So where was their alleged chivalry and jealousy at that time? Everything that is happening is nothing but a move funded by Saudi money with the aim of destabilizing and begging for a breakthrough on the internal front. Especially after Saudi Arabia saw the extent of the widespread tribal and popular mobilization and the serious rally around the Leader’s call to unite ranks and unify efforts to extract rights and break the siege. In the face of this cohesion, the forces of aggression found no escape but to rush to fabricate these crises and explode artificial strife in an attempt to distract the people from their basic battle. Today, the tribes of Al-Jawf Governorate have a high degree of awareness of the Saudi plans that specifically target their governorate. Riyadh does not want stability for Al-Jawf, but rather seeks to keep it an open arena for sustainable tribal revolts and conflicts, to prevent the unification of the ranks of its people and the exploitation of their promising land located on the border borders. However, this Saudi bet will disappear thanks to the vigilance of the Al-Jawf tribes, which stand on the lookout for all tools and mercenaries. In general, in its management of the Yemeni file, Saudi Arabia is betting on the time factor, believing that the accumulation of living suffering and internal complications may generate crises and security bubbles that occupy Sanaa, and create alternative priorities that make it unable to respond to the continued siege, starvation, and economic aggression. In order to gain this time, Saudi Arabia continues to pump huge amounts of money to buy debts and mobilize hired workers to spark strife and disrupt the internal front, in a pre-emptive attempt to disrupt Sana’a’s strength and cohesion and prevent it from making any decisive military options to break the siege. It is a conspiracy in which the recent attempts to move some mercenaries under tribal banners in Al-Jawf represent the latest failed Saudi cards.
