اخبار اليمن – وطن نيوز
اخبار اليمن اليمن الان – اخبار اليمن اليوم
W6nnews.com ==== وطن === تاريخ النشر – 2026-06-19 04:10:00
The dimensions of the recently signed memorandum of understanding between Washington and Tehran sparked a massive wave of discontent and sharp criticism inside America, and a state of astonishment and frustration behind the scenes and in Zionist circles, accompanied by miserable attempts by the Israeli enemy entity to change the course of the agreement by activating the escalation front in southern Lebanon, trying to come out with the least losses and save face. Based on field and political data, and the cards of the power present on the field and their organic ability to stifle international navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, US President Trump retreated to a position of defense, justifying his signing by submitting to the pressures of the monopolies of major oil companies and fearing an imminent global economic catastrophe that would ravage the financial and stock markets. Iran emerged from the “long-suffering” battle with the “carpet weaver” mentality, while the White House lost it with the “real estate dealer” mentality. In this context, the editor-in-chief of the Lebanese Al-Binaa newspaper, Mr. Nasser Qandil, reviewed the details of the scene, the course of the war, and the secrets behind the scenes of the last hours, stressing that had it not been for the stifling economic crisis that America had entered, and had it not been for the presence of 70% internal popular opposition to the war, Trump would not have been able to pass this agreement at all. Professor Nasser Qandil said: “Trump strengthened those who were facing him, opponents of the war and those affected by the economic collapse, to offer him a way out of this war, and now everyone in America is wondering bitterly: ‘Were these results worth a war? Wouldn’t it have been better if we had signed the agreement that was available in Muscat, or that was available again in Geneva?’” He added: “In this agreement, Trump made enormous concessions that were not previously offered, including the establishment of an investment fund worth $300 billion for Iran, and the complete release, without any controls, of frozen Iranian assets. When Trump is asked today about this agreement, he justifies it by defending Iran’s right to obtain ballistic missiles and its frozen funds, in a way that confirms the collapse of American media discourse. Qandil said: “When Trump is asked about Iranian ballistic missiles, he answers, defending Iran: “They are not the only ones who have ballistic missiles. There are many countries that have them, so why should only they be prevented from them?” When asked about the frozen assets, he says backingly: “This is their money in the end, and it must return to them, and seizing it harms the American financial system.” Qandil explained that Trump had verbally admitted that if the matter had continued for a maximum of four weeks, the global economy would have completely collapsed, and the strategic oil reserves would have run out in all countries of the world. He added: “The major monopolistic oil companies such as Chevron and Exxon Mobil came and said to Trump: ‘You have until June 30 for the Strait of Hormuz to be reopened.’ Trump actually tried to open the Strait of Hormuz with military force through what was called ‘Operation Freedom’ and then ‘Operation Freedom Plus’, leading to a direct attempt to seize the islands off the Strait of Hormuz, in which the result was disastrous for the American. An Apache helicopter was shot down for him, and thus he reached a dead end, and was forced, unwillingly and arrogantly, to pay the exit tax from the war. At the strategic level, Qandil revealed that there are two big things: The first thing is Iran’s success in integrating Lebanon into the plan to end the war, according to a decisive religious, moral and political premise that says: “We cannot accept that the war on Lebanon continues while Iran exits the war,” explaining that Iran is fully committed that unless what was agreed upon is fully implemented, the Iranian power cards (starting from the Strait of Hormuz and ending with the missile bombardment of northern occupied Palestine) will be ready to be activated immediately in order to impose this matter. He pointed out that the Israeli enemy entity will be the one who pays the price for the joint American-Israeli defeat in the war against Iran, and on the other hand, the first to reap the fruits of liberating southern Lebanon from the occupation are our steadfast people in the Gaza Strip, with the axis of resistance in all its limbs and vitality (from Yemen to Iraq to Gaza to Lebanon) restoring its strength as a major support force for the Palestinian cause, which places us before major strategic transformations. The second strategic matter is to hand over the Strait of Hormuz to bilateral (Iranian-Omani) administration. In the same context, Qandil said: “Just two days before the memorandum was announced, the talks had completely collapsed. After the downing of the Apache helicopter and the bombing operations that targeted the islands near the Strait of Hormuz, Iran then suspended any discussion of negotiations. He added, “There were three issues and strategic elements that were still pending, and Iran required that they be resolved, otherwise there would be no agreement. They were: the issue of Lebanon and the first article related to ending the war and requiring Lebanon to be part of it. The second matter was the complete liberation of the frozen assets, and the third matter was managing the Strait of Hormuz in partnership with Oman.” He added: “After that, the Qatari delegate arrived in Tehran and stayed there for two full days in long hours of intense negotiations, and he is in direct and constant contact with Washington.” Regarding these three headings, he pointed out that the latest Iranian position was strict: either getting these three headings in the text and clauses of the agreement clearly or there is no agreement, and the Americans were forced to accept and include them, but they wanted Western public opinion to swallow them gradually, “dose after dose,” because presenting these three provisions together as blows to the head causes blindness. Western society acts on the basis that America is the most powerful power in the world, so how can it kneel and submit before Iran? And Qandil considered that accepting the management of the Strait of Hormuz brings to mind the circumstances And the conditions under which the “Montreux Agreement” was born in the 1930s, which granted Turkey full sovereignty over the Bosphorus and Dardanelles Straits within the framework of allowing free commercial navigation and subjecting military navigation to control and preconditions, adding: “Today we are facing an international agreement completely similar to the Montreux Agreement, which will be translated through the additional protocol that will be prepared by Iran and Oman, and it will be in the text of the resolution that will be issued by the UN Security Council at the end of the sixty days of negotiations.” He stated that, accordingly, the agreement included stopping the taking of fees in Hormuz for only sixty days (during the negotiation period), followed by a joint arrangement and consultation for the management of the Strait between Iran, Oman and the countries of the region in accordance with international laws and in a way that preserves Iran’s national security, which explains the reason for the absence of this sensitive part from the initial leaks to the Western “Bloomberg” agency, as Iran imposed it as a decisive condition in the last hours, taking advantage of the strangulation of field navigation. Qandil stressed that the global economy is now at the mercy of the resistance fronts above the waters where the oil tankers are He considered that this sensitive global node extending from East Asia to Europe and America is now divided between two main centres: the bottom of the Bab al-Mandab Strait and the bottom of the Strait of Hormuz, and both centers and straits are today “in the hands of the fronts of the axis of resistance.” He said: “The world must now deal with the axis of resistance as a major international strategic power, and an essential partner in international security, and this is the matter.” An established fact that nothing will mitigate, no matter how much the Israeli enemy entity tries to riot and maneuver in the Yemeni neighborhood through the African coast in Somaliland or elsewhere, because what the axis of resistance and Yemen aspire to and possess is the imposition of sovereignty and the actual ability to say: “You will not cross the Red Sea without our approval,” and this decision will not change, regardless of the fleets, forces, and tools. No one will be able to cancel Yemen’s ability to have an organic and structural influence on the use of the Red Sea corridor. And regarding the balance of steadfastness, Qandil explained that Iran was able Militarily, it created a “balance of pain” in the face of the adversary alliance, and placed the global economy at risk of collapse, while the American was unable to place Iran at risk of collapse, as it bet on blockading the ports and striking the economic foundations of steel and petrochemical plants, but estimates by the American Intelligence Agency (CIA) confirmed that Iran’s ability to withstand is a minimum of 6 months, while America’s ability does not exceed 60 days from the date of the ceasefire, and therefore America rushed to sign when the period expired, in obedience to Ras companies. Money and the stock market, which Trump and the leaders of the G7 Summit are conspired to do, as he had previously threatened to annihilate Iran and return it to the Stone Age, causing stocks to fall and oil prices to explode, while stocks improved immediately after he talked about peace. Regarding the American internal criticism and Zionist anger, Qandil pointed out that the opponents in America are criticizing Trump not for a coup against the agreement, but for the fact that he fought a failed war that resulted in additional losses and costs that could have been avoided by agreeing early, and the supportive lobbies. The Israeli enemy in America has become a helpless minority because 70% of Americans refuse to fight for the Zionist entity. Regarding the entity, Qandil says: “The anger is overwhelming because the Zionist public opinion feels insulted and humiliated because it is merely a servile follower of the American decision that has lost its alleged independence, and because the terms of the agreement have demolished all dreams of the so-called “Greater Israel” and the buffer zones and talk about changing the alleged “Middle East,” as it has become clear that the mountain of illusions that they built is a mountain of sand or salt It collapses under the blows of water cannons coming from the Gulf, and makes the Israeli enemy see its true size and is unable to fight the war alone after America’s inability to cover it.” Qandil pointed out that America, as usual, when it is defeated and loses (as it lost in Ukraine and abandoned Zelensky, asking him to give the Russians their lands and sharing the gas market with Moscow, and demanding that Europe pay the bill), it immediately moves to another position and forces its allies to pay the bill Economic, and the Israeli enemy entity is paying the strategic security price. He added: “While Washington did not bother to make a phone call to its Lebanese allies who put their eggs in its basket to put them in the form of the Tehran Agreement after taking all the concessions from them, we find a corresponding model embodied in Iran, which stood with its allies and the resistance forces and did not accept the agreement to come to light unless its first clause explicitly stipulated stopping the war on all fronts of the region, especially Lebanon, and preserving the unity, safety and sovereignty of its lands. Let two models appear before the world: a model that sells its friends and throws losses at them, and a model that shares with its allies the burden of lofty wars and shares the common harvest and harvest with them in victory. “The living evidence in the American press demonstrates the correctness of the political and field reading proposed by Professor Nasser Qandil, revealing the extent of the shock and discontent in Washington, where the former US Secretary of State, and one of the architects of the 2015 agreement, Anthony Blinken, wrote, criticizing on his page: “The achievement is The only solution to this ceasefire is likely to be the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, which was already open and intact before the war began, and it appears clear that we will pay Iran a reward for this, in the form of broad exemptions from the export of Iranian crude oil. Directly on the consolidation of the Iranian regime and its power.” While the New York Times headlined its front page on Friday evening: “Iran emerges from a confrontation with the most powerful military force in the world while maintaining strategic gains.” In turn, Republican Senator Bill Cassidy says: “President Reagan is now turning in his grave with regret. Iran’s nuclear ambitions have never been curbed, and the current war has done nothing but teach the Iranians and prove to them that they have much greater influence and pressure on the Strait of Hormuz and on the global economy as a whole than they thought and believed.” Previously, as for the American writer Rex Hopke, he wrote in his column in the newspaper “USA Today”: “In short, we have completely returned to square one and to point zero, but with a fundamental and glaring difference, which is that Iran is now in a much stronger geopolitical position, because everyone, without exception, knows with certainty that it can repel the United States of America and confront it by strangling and closing a sensitive part of the global oil supply through Hormuz.” Hopke continued his attack: “Things may change in the future, but it appears now that everything.” What this war did was encourage Iran and give its hardline leaders very large financial resources, and revive the nuclear negotiations that had been successfully conducted during the era of the previous Obama administration. This is not a victory for us at all, and Trump may come out as usual and describe it as the best and most wonderful peace agreement in history, but in reality it is not a real agreement at all; it seems to everyone in the world as if we are surrendering in a humiliating way just to get out of a war that we should not have started or been involved in in the first place. He added, based on the current material data He ignited an uncalculated war with Iran, caused huge damage to the global economy, and caused the prices of gasoline and fuel to rise dramatically in the United States, and now he has submissively agreed to stop the war on the condition that Iran reopens the Strait of Hormuz, which is the same strait that was open, safe and secure before Trump’s war adventure. So, in short, we are back to square one, but with a stronger Iran strategically and internationally, and in the last appearance of the American president signing the agreement, the signs of defeat were evident So, retreating to a position of defense, he justified his signature with fear of a major economic catastrophe that almost ravaged his country’s economy and the economy of the world as a whole. He acknowledged that every time he spoke about the possibility of peace, the stock market and the stock market rose skyrocketing and never fell, so he leaned down on the table, tremblingly holding the pen and writing his signature from France, not out of love for peace, but out of fear of the defeat imposed on him by the stick of the Islamic Republic, and in fear of an economic catastrophe that began in the Strait of Hormuz and was not going to end. Other international shipping lanes
