اخبار السعودية – وطن نيوز
عاجل اخبار السعودية – اخبار اليوم السعودية
W6nnews.com ==== وطن === تاريخ النشر – 2024-02-01 11:14:10
https://sputnikarabic.ae/20240201/analysts-batelli-meetings-with-leaders-of-armed-formations-will-not-be-the-solution-in-Libya-1085634217.html
Analysts: Batelli’s meetings with leaders of armed formations will not be the solution in Libya
Analysts: Batelli’s meetings with leaders of armed formations will not be the solution in Libya
The armed formations in the capital, Tripoli, are still the ones controlling the course of the political process there, as these formations contributed to the crisis of the political track in the country because they follow… 01.02.2024, Sputnik Arabic
2024-02-01T08:14+0000
2024-02-01T08:14+0000
2024-02-01T08:14+0000
Exclusive
News
Arab world
Libya news today
United Nations Organization
/html/head/meta[@name=”og:title”]/@content
/html/head/meta[@name=”og:description”]/@content
https://cdn1.img.sputnikarabic.ae/img/07e7/07/0b/1078936097_0:0:3072:1728_1920x0_80_0_0_2ec3986877291e21b3e51cf2f2fe9ab6.jpg
The meeting of the leaders of these formations with the UN envoy in the capital, Tripoli, did not lead to the desired results that would help in the solution, according to analysts. Political influence In this context, political analyst Fawzi Al-Haddad confirmed, in an exclusive statement to “Sputnik”, that Batelli’s meeting with the leaders of the armed and security formations was to urge them To play a role in restoring peace and stability, and to support reconciliation efforts to reach a permanent solution to the Libyan crisis, but this largely floating talk is tinged with fear of these armed formations for Batelli’s efforts or for all previous efforts aimed at finding a solution to the Libyan crisis. On the other hand, Al-Haddad believes that Batelli said in his meeting with them that this meeting comes in the context of meetings with everyone involved in settling the solution within the framework of the solution being Libya-Libya, and therefore they are one of the symbols of the crisis in Libya and they should be communicated with. He stressed that these formations belong to active political and security entities in the country. Specifically in the capital, as evidenced by the fact that they demanded in their meeting with the UN envoy in the capital that he participate in his five-year meetings with the Libyan leaders, Abdul Hamid Dabaiba, and they demanded the exclusion of some parties, including Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar, which means that they are in agreement with the national unity government, given that they are affiliated with it financially. This calls for the feeling that there is an alliance between these armed formations and the national unity government. He explained that the leaders of these armed formations are very influential in the political process, because the government and those allied with them use them, meaning they have used them throughout the previous years, or they have used successive authorities in Tripoli to confirm their presence. He played the role of defender of the political authority in the capital, Tripoli, whatever authority it was, or whoever held the reins or whoever was authorized to have financial authorizations, and they defended him in one way or another, or threatened him, or blackmailed him in ways that everyone knows, and therefore their influence has increased. It is subject to other influences, the most important of which are international, regional and local alliances, according to him. He considered that the leaders of these formations are looking for political influence. During their meeting with UN delegate Batelli, they said that they wanted a representative from them in the dialogue. This was their demands, and thus they will transform into a body with a political facade. Al-Haddad confirmed. The end of these formations will only be within the framework of a comprehensive political, security and military agreement sponsored by the United Nations in which the division of the military establishment and the government division ends. After that, it is possible to talk about the end of the armed formations that do not care about politicians, but rather use them in an opportunistic way that serves them and they serve them in many cases. Difficulty. The agreement: For his part, the political analyst, Mohamed Mahfouz, says that it is natural for the UN envoy to meet with the leaders of the armed formations because they are active parties on the ground that possess weapons and power, and this matter is at the heart of the UN envoy’s work, especially since the mission sponsored previous meetings with the leaders of the security formations in Tunisia, Tripoli and Benghazi. Thus, when the mission wants to go to a new political path according to the framework of the five-year initiative, it is natural for these actors to meet, because they are influential forces who can influence any agreements that occur between the political parties, and therefore they cannot be ignored or go to any political paths apart from any presence in them. The scene. Mahfouz continued in his statement to “Sputnik”: “It is not possible to adopt any options without agreement with the military forces, and the evidence for this is when the House of Representatives assigned Bashagha to the government, this matter did not see the light of day, because there were many military forces that did not accept this matter and did not There was no consensus, and therefore they were influential, and if they were not, the international parties would not have dealt with them according to the principle of the active parties on the ground.” The political analyst explained that the issue of armed formations is essentially legitimized under official state agencies, and this is a problem, and real treatment requires a long period. Or years, preceded by a state of stability. Before that, it is necessary to have elected institutions, which produce a state of stability, that is, legislative and executive stability, and to avoid the conflicts that occur, represented by each party seeking to reach power through dialogues or dark rooms. Mahfouz concluded that the matter will not happen. Its solution is only by holding elections for strong authorities capable of imposing the prestige of the state and capable of creating a state of stability after which the overwhelming chaos in the country will diminish and will not end, and after that there will be a solution to the security problems, and closing the issue of armed formations will be much easier than talking about it now, because in many It is often said that the influence of military powers in the East or in the West is much greater than the influence of political powers in the East or in the West.
https://sputnikarabic.ae/20240130/The-role-of-sheikhs-and-notables-in-resolving-conflicts-and-disagreements-in-Libya-1085568088.html
https://sputnikarabic.ae/20240127/Libya-new-parliamentary-movements-for-parliamentary-and-presidential-elections-1085483818.html
https://sputnikarabic.ae/20240128/Libya-the-political-affairs-committee-at-the-top-of-the-state-begins-to-consult-with-the-UN-mission-to-reach-a-political-solution-1085515638.html
2024
News
ar_EG
Exclusive, news, the Arab world, Libya news today, the United Nations
Exclusive, news, the Arab world, Libya news today, the United Nations
Exclusive
The armed formations in the capital, Tripoli, still control the course of the political process there, as these formations contributed to the crisis of the political track in the country because they follow specific directions and agendas.
Political influence
In this context, political analyst Fawzi Al-Haddad confirmed, in a special statement to “Sputnik”, that Batelli’s meeting with the leaders of the armed and security formations was to urge them to play a role in restoring peace and stability, and to support reconciliation efforts to reach a permanent solution to the Libyan crisis, but this is quite vague talk. There is great fear of these armed formations due to Batelli’s efforts or all previous efforts aimed at finding a solution to the Libyan crisis.
On the other hand, Al-Haddad believes that Batelli says in his meeting with them that this meeting comes in the context of meetings with everyone involved in settling the solution within the framework of the solution being Libya-Libya, and therefore they are one of the symbols of the crisis in Libya and should be communicated with.
He explained that the leaders of these armed formations are very influential in the political process, because the government and those allied with them use them, meaning they have used them throughout the previous years, or they have used successive authorities in Tripoli to confirm their presence and play the role of defender of the political authority in the capital, Tripoli, whatever authority it was, or Everyone who held the reins or everyone who was authorized to obtain financial authorizations and defended him in one way or another, or threatened him or blackmailed him in one of those ways that everyone knows, and therefore their influence may be dependent on other influences, the most important of which are international, regional and local alliances, according to him.
He considered that the leaders of these formations were looking for political influence. During their meeting with UN delegate Batelli, they said that they wanted a representative from them in the dialogue. This was their demands, and thus they will turn into a body with a political facade.
Al-Haddad stressed that the end of these formations will only be within the framework of a comprehensive political, security and military agreement sponsored by the United Nations in which the division of the military institution and the government division ends. After that, we can talk about the end of the armed formations that do not care about politicians, but rather use them in an opportunistic way that serves them and they serve them in many cases. .
Difficulty agreeing
Mahfouz continued in his statement to “Sputnik”: “It is not possible to adopt any options without consensus with the military forces, and the evidence of this is when the House of Representatives assigned Bashagha to the government, this matter did not see the light of day, because there were many military forces that did not accept this matter and there were no Agreed, and therefore they are influential, and if they were not, international parties would not deal with them according to the principle of active parties on the ground.”
The political analyst explained that the issue of armed formations is basically legitimized under official state agencies and this is a problem, and the real treatment requires a long period or years, preceded by a state of stability and before that it is necessary to have elected institutions, which produces a state of stability, that is, legislative and executive stability, and to move away from About the conflicts that occur, as each party seeks to achieve power through dialogues or dark rooms.
