اخبار موريتانيا – وطن نيوز
اخر اخبار موريتانيا اليوم – اخبار موريتانيا العاجلة
W6nnews.com ==== وطن === تاريخ النشر – 2026-05-08 03:50:00
In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful, to Mr. President of the Republic, Mohamed Ould Mohamed Ahmed, Mr. President, here we are, and nearly seven years have passed since August 2, 2019. I find it necessary to inform you that during this period, by God’s grace and success, judicial decisions have been approved that have the authority of res judicata against me: a complete disclaimer of responsibility for any crime committed by the head of state, or that affects the integrity and sincerity in performing and exercising my duties as President. For the Republic. The decisions of the Supreme Court have protected what was ruled by the anti-corruption courts before which I appeared, from the falsity and fabrication of the charges that were brought against me on the basis of Law: 2016-014, related to combating corruption, and they confirmed my acquittal of the charges of: – Exploiting influence. – Abusing the position. – Dissipating the state’s real estate properties. – Obtaining undue material benefits from a public group. – Interfering in commercial activities that contradict my job capacity by taking benefits from contracts and auctions. Granting unjustified privileges in the field of public procurement. With this freedom from the people’s and state’s money, I emerged from the ordeal of being targeted with peace of mind and peace of mind that would support me as long as I remained. I am reassured by the presence of God, who has undermined the plots of the evil ones and has left their efforts to desecrate my image in the wind. But the dominance of those who took over the leadership of the “Great Efk”, and who had combined power and money, would not have been satisfied with anything short of taking away my freedom to go and return, depriving me of my civil rights, and stripping me of my property. To this end, and by employing the presence and dominance of a directed public prosecution, they got what they wanted, albeit with a scandalous output, as it came through a fabricated composition that combined disparate texts out of context, and without taking into account the basic principles of the law. Thus, the conviction came on the basis of the title: “Enrichment”, which must be completed in order to complete its criminal description: “unlawful” according to the wording (Article: 16) of the Anti-Corruption Law, that the employee is unable to provide a justification for the increase that occurred in his property, which is not achieved in the property I have, and the way to obtain it is easy and available to follow. I declared what I had of it on the occasion of the declaration, and the source of what was not mentioned in the declaration, when the court asked about its source, and in response to the persistence of “those appointed as civil parties” in gossiping and gossiping regarding that part, and with the utmost frankness and detail: – That an amount is: five million five hundred thousand 5,500,000 euros, in denomination of two hundred (200) euros. And an amount of five million 5,00,0000 dollars, in the form of one hundred (100) dollars, which you handed over to me hand in hand as a gift, after you handed over power and before I traveled outside the country. I also received fifty Toyota/Hilux cars from you, the keys of which were held by the then minister, the current commissioner of the Senegal River Investment Organization. Mr. President, without any detail that the place does not allow; Through that statement, the court identified a source of what was considered enrichment, which is the most important part of the estimated increase in declared property, but in order to reach what the conviction was based on, it considered that the funds associated with the electoral campaigns are not considered a legitimate source, in accordance with the requirements of Legal Order: 2006-035, issued on: November 2, 2006, related to the financing of electoral campaigns, which cannot be relied upon, whatever it may be, in arriving at the combination that the court concluded. Between criminalization on the basis of violating this legal order, and a penalty imposed by the Anti-Corruption Law, for the following considerations: 1. Legal Order: 2006-035, related to the financing of electoral campaigns, is criticized, among other things, for: – The fact that the bodies charged with enforcing it were not appointed on the occasion of all the elections that were held since its issuance, and those addressed to it did not take the initiative to adhere to any of its requirements, which made it practically in the rule of obsolete law. – That it only addresses: “the candidate in a single ballot, and every candidate at the head of a list in the list ballot,” and the last entrustment to me in that capacity. It is the 2014 presidential elections (two years before the anti-corruption law was issued). – Then it does not include any penal provisions other than what was stated (Article: 14) regarding the punishment of the candidate who violates the financial arrangements stipulated in it, either: “a fine from 400,000 ouguiyas to 10,000,000 ouguiyas, and imprisonment from one month to a year, or with one of these two punishments only.” 2. And that this combination prepared to reach the hypothetical crime, even in its part linked to the requirements of the Anti-Corruption Law itself, “illicit enrichment”, does not help in achieving what is intended by stripping me of my property as hoped by the conspirators: – Whereas (Article: 29) of Law: 2016-014, stipulates that freezing and seizure during the initial search and investigation stages are limited to funds obtained from the crime or related to it. – And that Such requirements are stipulated (Article 30) of the same law when ruling on confiscation as a punishment for it being related to the convict’s property obtained from the crime, and nothing else. – In accordance with the same requirements came the ruling of the first instance, and the decision of the Court of Appeal, and they were strengthened by the decision of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court by limiting the confiscation to “…all of his properties obtained from the commission of these crimes, whatever their nature, for the benefit of the public treasury.” Despite all of this, and with your judicial decisions, and your personal testimony that my property was purged of the Mauritanian people’s money, by arbitrary “over-the-top” decisions, all my personal property, including: – What I owned before 2016, the date of the issuance of the law on the basis of which the trial was conducted. The principle is the non-retroactivity of laws. – What I achieved after I finished my presidential term; The most important source of it is you personally. – My financial entitlements derived from my salaries during my practice, and depriving me of benefiting from them as a former President of the Republic, and as retirement rights for a general in the army. – Even declared property. All of them, from the first moments of the accusation, were placed under dishonest hands, tampered with by various types that are too narrow to list, and their effects are evident. Not only that, the property of pre-minor members of my nuclear and extended family was taken away from any legal framework. What is worse is that there are many members of the social incubator who fell victim to the existence of this bond, and they suffered from the same plunder that befell me as a direct target and those close to him! In all the rulings and decisions issued on the judicial stage, the properties subject to confiscation were not specified; This is evidenced by: – The Court of Appeal, despite the finality of its decision in particular (054/2025), has returned and considered, through its decision No.: 0060/2026, dated: March 31, 2026, appeals and requests related to the recovery of property. If they had been included in Decision: 054/2025, this would have meant a final decision regarding its ownership, and it would have been immune from appeal. – The team that is described as representing the civil party, in its memorandum Before the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court – the last party to hear the case – he criticized the initial ruling and the decision of the Court of Appeal for not containing that limitation. Currently, according to what appears from the succession of events, “they” are in the process of selling all the property that was stolen under the names of freezing or seizing, for the benefit of preliminary search and investigation, and then finally confiscation without any established executive document! The first difficulty facing the implementation of Resolution No.: 54/2025, dated: May 14, 2025, is that the property subject to confiscation, according to its wording, is: “funds obtained from crime,” and the decision did not enumerate or specify it. Mr. President, it will not be a coincidence – the law was respected by stopping the confiscation at: “funds obtained from the crime,” as included in the criminalization text (Article: 30 / Anti-Corruption Law), and the text of the conviction decision. Or violated by exceeding all the property that was robbed, in implementing that decision, it is impossible to implement – to open those sales by offering for sale the cars gifted by you: the “Cadillac” car that you brought from America before assuming the presidency of the republic, and which you gave as a gift to whom you described as: “my sister” during the launch festival of your candidacy campaign in 2019, along with the fifty (50) cars that “grew me” from your generosity and you took over. It will not be a coincidence, because your gift represented (the Achilles’ heel – Talon d’Achille), from which the arrows of targeting struck me: – It is the source of the increase that was considered enrichment. They attached to it the description of “illegal”, to obtain a reason to impose an original penalty of deprivation of civil rights. – Later, by considering the disposal of that money by deposit and gift as laundering, they imposed a prison sentence on him from a law related to the proceeds of terrorism and drug crimes, allowing him to be deprived of the right to go. And finally, to ensure that this restriction lasts for the longest time, “washing it off” is coupled with an aggravating circumstance so that the result in the end is what the power and will of money and power came together. I and my family suffered severe moral and material harm because of that gift, but the feeling of suffering the most severe injustice is what was caused by the dominance of the sponsors of corruption and its henchmen over the scene, reassured and becoming more reassured that in all that has passed of your era, the ruler of accountability has not been opened. Against any of these, or none of them had the opportunity to reach their term so that the nation would be treated fairly with its looted funds and deter the herds of corruptors who were passing in their wrongdoing. At the end of the seventh year of your assumption of power, you have been convicted for fifteen years in the fight against corruption. Your biased courts have not succeeded in proving that Qatmir embezzled the people’s money. Mr. President, I have decided to address you directly in writing, not to beg you to intervene on my behalf, but rather to bear witness to the great Mauritanian people of the magnitude and severity of the injustice they have been subjected to, and to find, at the very least, support from your regime. How could you not, when you are more aware of the truth of that injustice than anyone else, and you rejected it as you told me personally, and as MP Biram Ould Dah later reported from you, in your response to Ahmed Ould Dada and Mohamed Ould Mawloud during the reception of each of them, when they demanded that I be prosecuted: that you know with certainty the source of my wealth and the lack of any connection to public money. Mr. President, recalling the upbringing that God has bestowed on you, where do you stand regarding the prohibitions, commands, promises, and threats mentioned in the words of the Mighty and Mighty regarding testimony: “And do not conceal testimony, and whoever conceals it is sinful in his heart, and God is for what you do.” All-Knowing. Al-Baqarah: 283, “And do not mix truth with falsehood, and conceal the truth while you know.” Al-Baqarah: 42. And do not conceal the testimony of God. To whom are the sinners? (Al-Ma’idah / 106) O you who have believed, be upholding justice as witnesses to God, even if it is against yourselves or your parents. And the closest ones: whether he is rich or poor, God is more worthy of them. So do not follow inclination lest you be just, even if you turn away or turn aside. Indeed, God is ever aware of what you do. (An-Nisa’ / 135) Mr. President, it is in your hands and upon you to put an end to this judicial farce, which is behind rotten politicians and businessmen, this farce that began by taking away my freedom, and is heading towards squandering my property and the property of my children and relatives, which places full responsibility on you in more than one way, now and in the future. What justice is undertaking through the “Office for the Management of Frozen, Seized and Confiscated Properties” represents a path that will lead to injustice whose effects will be incalculable, because they will force citizens to participate in wasting money to other people. The first of these people, under the guidance of officials at the highest levels within the ministry that is supposed to be for justice, began to frequent the department concerned with sales operations. Our properties that are not specified in your judicial decisions, and any of those decisions did not include a specification regarding them, their acquisition by anyone and under any circumstances remains without legal effect. Based on the importance and protection given by the Constitution to the right to property, and the limits set regarding the conditions for its expropriation. We expect you, Mr. President, with the authority you have and the responsibilities you have, not to allow more of our citizens to become victims of dual ownership, and for everyone to know that our property, which you witnessed before others has no relation to public money, and which your judiciary, whose Supreme Council you chair and whose decisions you are concerned about regarding it, has confirmed, will remain so as long as it remains and we remain. Nouakchott on: April 28, 2026 Former President of the Republic / Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz
